Why do we give so much money out to countries in foreign aid, when millions of children live in poverty here? - first aid for children
We have millions of children living in poverty in this country, but sends billions on foreign aid to other countries. Why can not solve our problems of poverty first?
Friday, January 22, 2010
First Aid For Children Why Do We Give So Much Money Out To Countries In Foreign Aid, When Millions Of Children Live In Poverty Here?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Sad, but true. It is devastating to see all these children from other countries with a swollen belly, and health problems are horrible. But I must say that if someone give you free medical treatment in another country, including the obtaining of the family here, and here's why we can not give, and the same medical treatment to anyone here. As a single mother trying to work and can not afford health insurance and see what kind of care received. I know I've been there.
ReplyDeleteSad, but true. It is devastating to see all these children from other countries with a swollen belly, and health problems are horrible. But I must say that if someone give you free medical treatment in another country, including the obtaining of the family here, and here's why we can not give, and the same medical treatment to anyone here. As a single mother trying to work and can not afford health insurance and see what kind of care received. I know I've been there.
ReplyDeleteSad, but true. It is devastating to see all these children from other countries with a swollen belly, and health problems are horrible. But I must say that if someone give you free medical treatment in another country, including the obtaining of the family here, and here's why we can not give, and the same medical treatment to anyone here. As a single mother trying to work and can not afford health insurance and see what kind of care received. I know I've been there.
ReplyDeleteWe do this to reduce the risks of war, and now terrorism. In reality, America has one of the stingiest country in the world, which had become the most giving. Poverty is a matter of personal productivity, and a matter of voluntary investment, governments can take very little else than an impartial referee in the courts and educating the population.
ReplyDeleteThis is because poverty is not the same as the nation's poverty in another nation. If you opt for the poverty in Can / US, old jeans, and you live in a small apartment. If you are in poverty in Ethiopia, is starving.
ReplyDeleteWe can not solve the insoluble, but we can alleviate the pain.
ReplyDeleteThe United States did not actually send so many other countries, such as Andrew said.
What incorrectkly said that poverty can be reduced transfer payments, but is obviously incorrect. There is poverty, have less money than is necessary, provided, by definition, that the money is actually the end of poverty of the recipient.
And many European countries have a poverty still much lower in the United States because they are dealing.
Foreign aid is a small, small percentage of our budgets, rising costs are a big part of our social service programs, including health care and the "transfer" for the elderly. Considerable sums are also being used in public housing, food, public transportation, public education, and other forms of "social services".
ReplyDeleteHistory has shown that money takes from one group to "give" to another group of little to alleviate poverty. The socialist countries of Europe and Asia has been trying for years and ended only with the large bureaucracies and ailing economies.
It is true that the U.S. is too much for senior citizens (health care spending, nursing homes,) social security and now very little about the younger workers and children. Public education in particular, was poorly managed in most cases a fraction of what is happening in the lives of retirees is for women, infants and children.
But foreign aid is much, much smaller than even this amount, but most of the U.S. dollar in foreign aidemigrated to America and then produces an agricultural land that flows back into our economy and our earnings.
We were, I believe, the first country to tackling obesity as a health problem for the poor in our country to fight. This is in contrast to countries in Asia, Latin America and Africa, where people are starving, living in huts at birth or health problems that were cured in one of our hospitals in a few days.
If you are homeless? Did you suffer from malnutrition? He has half of their children die of diarrhea or flu? If the United States, which is very unlikely. In large parts of the developing world, this happens every day, millions. Is drinking water? Edible? Clothing? You probably have to do. Approximately one billion people worldwide do not.
Poverty is relative. Compared to, say, the husband of Nancy Pelosi was, I damn bad. Compared to most people in sub-Saharan Africa, I am rich enough to GD!
Foreign aid is a small, small percentage of our budgets, rising costs are a big part of our social service programs, including health care and the "transfer" for the elderly. Considerable sums are also being used in public housing, food, public transportation, public education, and other forms of "social services".
ReplyDeleteHistory has shown that money takes from one group to "give" to another group of little to alleviate poverty. The socialist countries of Europe and Asia has been trying for years and ended only with the large bureaucracies and ailing economies.
It is true that the U.S. is too much for senior citizens (health care spending, nursing homes,) social security and now very little about the younger workers and children. Public education in particular, was poorly managed in most cases a fraction of what is happening in the lives of retirees is for women, infants and children.
But foreign aid is much, much smaller than even this amount, but most of the U.S. dollar in foreign aidemigrated to America and then produces an agricultural land that flows back into our economy and our earnings.
We were, I believe, the first country to tackling obesity as a health problem for the poor in our country to fight. This is in contrast to countries in Asia, Latin America and Africa, where people are starving, living in huts at birth or health problems that were cured in one of our hospitals in a few days.
If you are homeless? Did you suffer from malnutrition? He has half of their children die of diarrhea or flu? If the United States, which is very unlikely. In large parts of the developing world, this happens every day, millions. Is drinking water? Edible? Clothing? You probably have to do. Approximately one billion people worldwide do not.
Poverty is relative. Compared to, say, the husband of Nancy Pelosi was, I damn bad. Compared to most people in sub-Saharan Africa, I am rich enough to GD!